Guided Implant Surgery

You are here:

What Guided Implant Surgery Means

In guided implant surgery, the position of every implant is decided on three-dimensional data before the operation, not during it. A CBCT scan and a digital scan of the mouth are merged into one 3D model, the implants are planned in that model, and a patient-specific surgical guide is then produced that transfers exactly this plan into the mouth.

The guide is a small template that sits on the teeth, the gum or the bone. Metal sleeves in the template define the entry point, the angle and the depth of the drill. The surgeon still carries out the surgery — the guide constrains where the drill can go. In the literature this approach is called static computer-aided implant surgery, navigated or template-guided implant placement.

What Changes When the Plan Comes First

Two things change measurably. First, the implant ends up closer to the position that was planned: across 53 clinical studies and 4,504 implants, static guides transferred the plan with a mean deviation of 1.11 mm at the entry point, 1.44 mm at the implant tip and 3.58° in angle (Khaohoen et al., 2024). Freehand placement, without a guide, deviates measurably more.

Second, when the soft tissue situation allows the implant to be placed through the guide without opening a flap, patients report clearly less pain in the first days and the surgery itself is around 24 minutes shorter (Romandini et al., 2023).

What that accuracy is actually for: keeping a safety distance to the nerve canal in the lower jaw and to the sinus floor in the upper jaw, avoiding the roots of neighbouring teeth, and placing each implant where the future crown or bridge needs it — not simply where drilling is easiest.

How a Guided Case Is Planned at Stom Dental Centre

1. Tomography. A CBCT scan records the jaw in three dimensions: bone height and width, the course of the nerve canal, the position of the sinus and the roots of the remaining teeth.

2. Digital scan. The mouth is scanned digitally, so the shape of the teeth and gum is available as a precise surface model.

3. Planning on the computer. Both data sets are superimposed. Implant diameter, length, position, angle and depth are set in the 3D model, with the nerve and sinus outlined and the planned prosthetic result in view.

4. Patient-specific surgical guide. A guide is designed on the approved plan and produced as a 3D print with guide sleeves for the drills.

5. Placement in the planned position. On the day of surgery the guide is seated in the mouth and the implants are placed through its sleeves in the planned axis and depth, under local anaesthesia.

6. Check and prosthetic phase. The result is verified, the healing phase is planned, and the crown, bridge or full-arch restoration follows in the agreed sequence.

Real Planning Screens From Our Own Cases

The sequences below are recordings of our own planning sessions in Antalya — CBCT data, superimposed scans, nerve canals marked in red, planned implant axes and the design of the surgical guide. They show what a plan looks like before anyone touches a drill.

0:14
The 3D-printed surgical guide on the printed jaw model: the drill runs through the guide sleeve, in the axis and depth that were decided on screen.
0:08
Three-dimensional reconstruction from the CBCT scan, used for the overall assessment of jaw and teeth.
0:08
Jaw relation and occlusal plane assessed in three dimensions before the implant positions are fixed.
0:09
Planned implant positions in the 3D jaw model — decided on screen, before a surgical date is set.
0:12
CBCT data with the nerve canals marked in red — the implant positions are planned around them.
0:11
Every planned implant is checked slice by slice: bone width, available depth, distance to the nerve.
0:06
The complete plan in one view: teeth, bone, the course of the nerve and the implant axes.
0:09
The surgical guide is designed on the digital model; its sleeves define the drill axis.
0:05
Lower-jaw guide with guide sleeves, seated on the digital model.
0:10
Guide and planned implants together — this is the position that is transferred to the mouth.

Our own recordings from Stom Dental Centre in Antalya: planning sessions and a guide demonstration on a printed jaw model. The clips are silent, show no patient names and no patient records.

Have a recent CBCT scan? Send it to us on WhatsApp and our surgical team will tell you whether your case is suitable for guided placement — before you book a flight.

When a Guide Helps Most — and When It Is Not Needed

A guide earns its place where the margin for error is small: full-arch treatments such as All-on-4 and All-on-6, narrow or reduced bone, implants close to the nerve canal or the sinus, implants in the visible front region, and cases where a temporary bridge is prepared in advance so it can be fitted immediately after surgery.

It is not needed in every case. A single implant in a wide, healthy ridge with clear anatomical landmarks can be placed accurately without a template. And when the gum has to be opened anyway — for bone augmentation, for a lateral sinus lift, for soft tissue correction — the surgeon has direct sight of the bone, and a guide adds little. Which route fits your case is a clinical decision, made after the CBCT scan.

If You Are Travelling to Antalya

The surgical guide has to be designed and produced before the operation, so the plan comes first and the surgical date is set once the plan is approved. If you already have a recent CBCT scan, send it to us in advance: in many cases we can tell you before you travel whether guided placement is the right approach for you, and what the sequence of visits would look like.

Your written, itemised treatment plan states which steps are included. Ask for it in writing before treatment begins — that is the norm at our clinic, and it is a fair question to ask any clinic.

Honest Limitations

A guide makes the plan repeatable; it does not make it perfect. The pooled deviations above are averages, not guarantees, and a template only works as accurately as its fit: it needs stable support on teeth, mucosa or bone. In the back of the mouth, limited mouth opening can restrict the space the guided drills need.

The evidence is honest about complications as well. In flapless fully guided cases, 12% required an intraoperative change of approach and in 7% the implant could not be placed as planned — for example when the fit or the visibility was not sufficient, and the surgeon switched to an open procedure (Romandini et al., 2023). That is not an argument against guides; it is the reason a surgeon, not a template, remains responsible for the outcome.

Finally, accuracy at placement does not decide the long term on its own. Bone quality, oral hygiene, smoking, diabetes and regular check-ups determine whether an implant is still healthy in ten years.

🖼️ Free X-ray assessment

Send us your panoramic X-ray or photos on WhatsApp — our clinical team will send you a personal assessment within 24 hours. Free and with no obligation.

Send X-ray on WhatsApp

Free Consultation

Have questions about Guided Implant Surgery? Our team is happy to help — free and no obligation.

Key Takeaways

  • Flapless where possible: Clearly less pain in the first days and around 24 min shorter surgery than an open flap (Romandini et al., 2023)
  • Known limitation: 12% of flapless guided cases needed an intraoperative change of approach; 7% could not be placed as planned (Romandini et al., 2023)
  • Typical use: Single implants, multiple implants and full-arch cases such as All-on-4 and All-on-6
  • Safety structures: Nerve canal, sinus floor and neighbouring roots are outlined in the plan before surgery

What is guided implant surgery?

Guided implant surgery means the implant position is planned on three-dimensional data before the operation. A CBCT scan and a digital scan of the mouth are merged into one 3D model; implant position, angle and depth are decided in that model with the nerve canal and sinus marked, and a patient-specific surgical guide is produced. During surgery the implants are placed through the sleeves of that guide, in the planned axis. Across 53 clinical studies with 4,504 implants, static guides transferred the plan with mean deviations of 1.11 mm at the entry point and 3.58° in angle (Khaohoen et al., 2024). At Stom Dental Centre in Antalya the planning is done in-house and the surgical date is set after the plan is approved.

Treatment at a Glance
Planning dataCBCT (3D X-ray) plus a digital scan of the mouth, merged into one 3D model
Surgical guidePatient-specific, 3D-printed; its sleeves define drill entry, angle and depth
Accuracy of static guides1.11 mm at the entry point, 1.44 mm at the tip, 3.58° in angle (pooled, 4,504 implants — Khaohoen et al., 2024)
Flapless where possibleClearly less pain in the first days and around 24 min shorter surgery than an open flap (Romandini et al., 2023)
Known limitation12% of flapless guided cases needed an intraoperative change of approach; 7% could not be placed as planned (Romandini et al., 2023)
Typical useSingle implants, multiple implants and full-arch cases such as All-on-4 and All-on-6
Safety structuresNerve canal, sinus floor and neighbouring roots are outlined in the plan before surgery
Where the planning happensIn-house at Stom Dental Centre, Antalya — surgery is scheduled after the plan is approved
Planning data
CBCT (3D X-ray) plus a digital scan of the mouth, merged into one 3D model
Surgical guide
Patient-specific, 3D-printed; its sleeves define drill entry, angle and depth
Accuracy of static guides
1.11 mm at the entry point, 1.44 mm at the tip, 3.58° in angle (pooled, 4,504 implants — Khaohoen et al., 2024)
Flapless where possible
Clearly less pain in the first days and around 24 min shorter surgery than an open flap (Romandini et al., 2023)
Known limitation
12% of flapless guided cases needed an intraoperative change of approach; 7% could not be placed as planned (Romandini et al., 2023)
Typical use
Single implants, multiple implants and full-arch cases such as All-on-4 and All-on-6
Safety structures
Nerve canal, sinus floor and neighbouring roots are outlined in the plan before surgery
Where the planning happens
In-house at Stom Dental Centre, Antalya — surgery is scheduled after the plan is approved
Treatment Process: Step by Step
  1. Tomography (CBCT) — A three-dimensional scan records bone height and width, the nerve canal, the sinus and the roots of the remaining teeth.
  2. Digital scan of the mouth — The teeth and gum are scanned digitally to obtain a precise surface model.
  3. Planning on the computer — Both data sets are superimposed; diameter, length, position, angle and depth of each implant are set with the nerve and sinus outlined.
  4. Patient-specific surgical guide — The guide is designed on the approved plan and produced as a 3D print with sleeves for the drills.
  5. Placement in the planned position — The guide is seated in the mouth and the implants are placed through its sleeves in the planned axis and depth under local anaesthesia.
  6. Check and prosthetic phase — The result is verified, the healing phase is planned, and the crown, bridge or full-arch restoration follows in the agreed sequence.
Who Is a Good Candidate?

Ideal Candidates

  • Full-arch treatments such as All-on-4 or All-on-6, where implant angles decide the whole bridge
  • Narrow or reduced bone, where every millimetre of the available ridge counts
  • Implant sites close to the nerve canal in the lower jaw or the sinus floor in the upper jaw
  • Implants in the visible front region, where the axis decides the later aesthetics
  • Cases with a temporary bridge prepared in advance for fitting shortly after surgery
  • International patients who want the plan discussed and agreed before they travel

May Need Alternative Options

  • Single implants in a wide, healthy ridge with clear anatomical landmarks — a guide adds little there
  • Cases where the gum has to be opened anyway (bone augmentation, lateral sinus lift, soft tissue correction)
  • Very limited mouth opening in the back of the jaw, where guided drills need more vertical space
  • Situations without stable support for the template (insufficient remaining teeth, mobile mucosa) unless the guide is fixed separately
Benefits and Considerations

Benefits

  • The implant position is decided on 3D data, not improvised during surgery
  • Measurably smaller deviation from the plan than freehand placement
  • A defined safety distance to the nerve canal, sinus floor and neighbouring roots
  • Implants positioned for the planned crown or bridge, not only for the easiest bone
  • Where a flapless approach is possible: less pain in the first days and shorter surgery time
  • The plan can be reviewed and discussed before the surgical date — useful for patients travelling from abroad

Considerations

  • The pooled accuracy figures are averages, not a guarantee for the individual case
  • The guide only works as well as it fits — it needs stable support on teeth, mucosa or bone
  • Planning and production take time; the surgical date follows the approved plan
  • In some cases the surgeon has to switch to an open approach during surgery
  • Long-term success still depends on bone quality, hygiene, smoking and regular check-ups
Frequently Asked Questions
Is guided implant surgery more accurate than freehand placement?
Yes, measurably — but not perfectly. Pooled across 53 clinical studies and 4,504 implants, static guides transferred the plan with a mean deviation of 1.11 mm at the entry point, 1.44 mm at the implant tip and 3.58° in angle (Khaohoen et al., 2024). Freehand placement deviates more. The remaining deviation is exactly why a safety distance to the nerve and sinus is part of the plan.
Does guided surgery mean no incision and no stitches?
Sometimes, not always. When bone volume and gum thickness allow, the implant can be placed through the guide without opening a flap, and stitches may not be needed. Whether that is safe in your case is decided on the CBCT scan — if the surgeon needs direct sight of the bone, an open approach is the better choice.
Is it less painful than conventional implant placement?
In flapless fully guided cases, patients reported clearly lower pain in the first days after surgery and the operation was around 24 minutes shorter than with an open flap (Romandini et al., 2023). Implant placement is carried out under local anaesthesia; most patients describe pressure rather than pain. We make no promise about how an individual will feel — we plan for a smaller surgical wound where that is medically sensible.
Does every implant need a surgical guide?
No. A single implant in a wide, healthy ridge with clear landmarks can be placed accurately without a template. A guide is most valuable in full-arch cases, in narrow bone, close to the nerve or sinus, and in the visible front region. Which route fits your case is a clinical decision after the CBCT scan.
Can guided surgery be used for All-on-4 and All-on-6?
Yes — full-arch treatment is one of the strongest reasons to plan digitally. With four or six implants carrying a whole bridge, the angle of each implant affects the fit of the final restoration, so positions are planned in the 3D model together with the planned bridge.
Can implants be placed with a guide when there is little bone?
Often yes, and that is where planning matters most: the plan shows exactly how much bone is available and where a safety distance to the nerve or sinus remains. If the bone is genuinely insufficient, the honest answer is bone augmentation, a sinus lift or — in extreme upper-jaw atrophy — zygomatic implants, rather than forcing an implant into the wrong site.
Does guided surgery cost extra?
Digital planning and the guide are additional steps, and your written, itemised treatment plan states which steps are included in your quote. Ask for that plan in writing before treatment starts — it is the norm at our clinic and a fair question to ask any clinic.
I live abroad. Can the planning be done before I travel?
If you have a recent CBCT scan, send it to us in advance — in many cases we can say before you travel whether guided placement suits your case and how the visits would be sequenced. If no scan exists, the CBCT and the digital scan are taken here, and the surgical date follows once the plan is approved.
What can go wrong with a guided approach?
The template can fit imprecisely, limited mouth opening can restrict the guided drills, and the plan can turn out to be unsuitable once the site is exposed. In flapless fully guided cases, 12% required an intraoperative change of approach and 7% could not be placed as planned (Romandini et al., 2023). That is why the surgeon, not the guide, stays responsible for the decision in the chair.
Who plans the treatment at Stom Dental Centre?
The planning is done in-house by our surgical and prosthetic team in Antalya, with the prosthetic phase led by DDS PhD Telman Iskender. Treatment is discussed in English, German, Russian and Turkish, and the plan is reviewed before the surgical date is set.
A guide does not make the surgeon better — it makes the plan repeatable. We decide the implant position on the screen, with the nerve canal and the sinus marked, and the only job of the guide is to carry that decision into the mouth. If the plan is wrong, the guide will reproduce the mistake precisely — which is why the planning session, not the surgery, is where a case is won.
Dr. Telman IskenderDDS, Oral Surgery Specialist, 20+ Years Experience — Stom Dental Centre, Antalya

Scientific References

  1. Khaohoen A, Powcharoen W, Sornsuwan T, Chaijareenont P, Rungsiyakull C, Rungsiyakull P. Accuracy of implant placement with computer-aided static, dynamic, and robot-assisted surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical trials. BMC Oral Health. 2024;24:359.
  2. Romandini M, Ruales-Carrera E, Sadilina S, Hämmerle CHF, Sanz M. Minimal invasiveness at dental implant placement: A systematic review with meta-analyses on flapless fully guided surgery. Periodontology 2000. 2023;91(1):89-112.
  3. Naeini EN, Atashkadeh M, De Bruyn H, D'Haese J. Narrative review regarding the applicability, accuracy, and clinical outcome of flapless implant surgery with or without computer guidance. Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research. 2020;22(4):454-467.

Ready to Start Your Treatment?

Book a free consultation with our specialists in Antalya.

Last reviewed: August 2026

Contact Us

Contact us now to get information about our treatments.

Contact Us

Contact us now to get information about our treatments.

Healthy Smiles
Treatments